2.16.2005

Education as a Development Issue
Emma Fawcett reflects on teaching in Guatemala

I've spent the past few weeks working in an all-girls school in Zona 7 of Guatemala City with another volunteer. My students have been wonderful: friendly, enthusiastic, and eager. Their education system, sadly, is not.


Based almost entirely on rote learning, my students spend most of their day either copying from the board or cleaning the school. They are taught to serve and to follow, rather than to think for themselves — mopping the floors and laying out the teachers' supplies on her desk before she enters the room is of superior importance to developing critical thinking skills and liberal arts-based proficiency.


The girls are accustomed to an incredibly regimented daily routine and cannot function without highly specific instructions. One morning, I put some English expressions on the board (i.e. Good morning, hello, please, you're welcome, etc.) and asked my third graders to copy them into their notebooks. The room erupted into chaos with questions: pen or pencil; print or cursive; long notebook or short; copy it exactly as it appears on the board or in two columns? Games and interactive activities are nearly out of the question, especially with younger students, and fellow teachers look on in horror as we attempt to teach vocabulary through songs, like the Hokey Pokey.


The most distressing part, however, is that there is little pressure for change. Guatemalans who can afford private schools send their children there, and the disparities between private and public are astounding. In private schools, students are taught the same lessons twice a day — once in Spanish and once in English. Nationally, English doesn't figure in the curriculm and the students I have been teaching have had no prior exposure to the language. In fact, when another volunteer and I sought to teach at a second school in the afternoons, the principal was so frustrated with our lack of fluency in Spanish that she had no interest in our offer to teach English to her students. The principal and teachers are rather perplexed by the idea of volunteers from Western countries coming to teach in their schools, and they remain virtually unaware of the failings of their education system. As Guatemala has the largest indigenous population of any Latin American country (it ties with Bolivia), many here believe that that children should learn one of the major Mayan languages rather than Spanish. After a trip to the highlands and Lake Atitlan, I could soon understand this perspective, as I heard far more Tz'utyil and Kaqchikel than Spanish. The rift between the education of rich and poor seeks only to preserve the current social stratification, solidifying an already deeply divided society and preventing the growth of a substantial middle class.


The students are also in school for such a short period of time, due in part to the lack of school space. The girls' school starts at 7:40am and is finished by 12pm, with at least an hour off for lunch and recess. The same building is used as a boys' school in the afternoons, from 1:00-6:00 pm. With class sizes of 32 plus, individual attention is non-existent. Schools throughout much of the country are half-empty for most of January, when the public school year begins, as many families cannot afford the initial payment required for registration. If they can afford to send their children to school on a regular basis, the eyeglasses necessary to make them successful and remedial assistance for those with learning disabilities elude nearly all. Many students are held back due to poor performance and/or irregular attendance, so the back rows of most classrooms are filled with students at least 2-3 years older than the average age of the class.


Development is truly a "package deal," for without proper education systems, other efforts to improve daily life for local people around the world remain futile. At Lake Atitlan, Guatemalans in Santiago are fiercly proud of their water purification system, which was constructed by the Japanese. The building flies the Japanese flag and is adored by the locals. Yet, the villages around the Lake continue to burn their garbage or just dump it in the water, deforestation is rampant, and the shores of the lake are filthy with sewage in some sections. As a result, the tap water is still not safe to drink, smells like raw sewage, and in some places, emerges from the faucet with dark sediment. While the water purification system is a perfectly well-intended solution — and the people are no doubt better off than they would be without it — they cannot enjoy truly improved living standards without education, conservation, and cultural change.


Without the fundamental building block of society — education — my students are destined to live lives that mirror those of their mothers' generation: raising large families and cooking tortillas. Without education, they cannot build self-reliant communities with adequate medical care, proper housing, a safe water supply, and all the other elements of the developed world.


While the other volunteers and I were traveling through the countryside, we decided that there are a number of essential images of Guatemalan life, moments that truly capture what life here is like. As a result of Guatemala's huge indigous community, many (especially women) still wear traje, the traditional Mayan dress of long woven skirts, elaborate embroidered blouses, and ornate sashes. Walking through the streets of Guatemala City, one constantly encounters women in complete Mayan dress sipping bottles of Coca Cola and munching on Dominos pizza. When exploring the small villages that surround Lake Atitlan, we saw a Mayan woman washing her clothes against the rocks on the shores of the Lake (as nearly all women do), with a child strapped to her back in traditional fabrics. She had a basket of her family's laundry in one hand, a cell phone in other other, chattering away in an indigenous language. Like much of the developing world, Guatemala is in transition. Status symbols, like cell phones and Nike sneakers, take precedence over proper education. Children's teeth rot because their bottles are filled more cheaply with Pepsi than milk, and plans to improve the country's infrastructure are stalled by a sluggish economy and corrupt government. In many respects, the people of Guatemala have inherited many of the vices of the developed world with few of its virtues.


One wonders whether it is even possible to gradually bring about change and build sustainable communities while leaving treasured traditions and societal structures intact. Certainly, all the English teachers, housing projects, water purification systems, medical clinics, and agriscience experts in the world could improve their living standards, but at what cost?




Emma Fawcett, formerly an intern at World Hunger Year, is a volunteer teacher of English in Guatemala.

2.15.2005

Communities in Crisis
NSCAH releases hunger & homelessness study
Communities in Crisis

In a new study, being released today by the National Student Campaign Against Hunger and Homelessness, 2004 saw a 28 percent rise in emergency food assistance requests and a 27 percent increase in emergency shelter. At the same time, many homeless shelters and soup kitchens were forced to turn people away because they lacked beds, food and money. Many agencies reported funding cuts over the past year — cuts from government sources were most the frequent — and a significant percent of agencies that turned away requests for assistance reported a decrease in overall income in the past year.


The executive summery of the report — Community in Crisis — states:


Shamefully, hunger and homelessness are status quo in America today. It is common to see people sleeping on street vents, lined up at a community kitchen, or asking for change on the sidewalk.

However, much remains hidden or unknown. It is true that these problems have existed for decades, but they seem to be getting worse right now. Is that the case all over the country and in all types of communities? If so, why? How can we reverse this trend? There are charities and volunteers dedicated to helping, but can — and should — they do it alone? Government programs help many, but the U.S. and states are cutting billions of dollars from these programs. How is this affecting our communities and low income Americans?


The Student Campaign surveyed 900 agencies in 32 states for the study. One-quarter of the emergency food providers reported that they had to deny requests for food because of a lack of resources, and three-quarters of the emergency shelter providers said they had to turn people away for the same reason.


Calls to WHY's National Hunger Hotline (a service of the National Hunger Clearinghouse) reflect the survey's results. The Hotline has seen a steady increase in the volume of calls over the past year from people in need. Many needed assistance because they could not find employment or were working but were not earning enough to support their families. Food is usually the first place where people on a tight budget cut back. When they called the Hotline, they were referred to emergency services in their area.


At the same time, the Hotline has seen an increase in calls from community-based organizations who could not meet the increased demands on their services. WHY is able to provide them with information on funding but this does not meet their immediate needs.


What can be done? In its study, National Student Campaign Against Hunger and Homelessness calls on the government to provide assistance for the nation's most vulnerable:


America has an impressive and dedicated network of emergency food and shelter providers and a strong tradition of philanthropy and volunteerism that supports these agencies. However, the survey results clearly show that communities need help to keep up. Recent increases in people experiencing hunger and homelessness are overwhelming agencies, and cuts in government funding are exacerbating the situation.

The United States is the wealthiest country in the world; our government has access to unparalleled resources that it should put to use to address the community crises of hunger and homelessness. The trend of reduced federal and state spending for social programs is out of sync with reality and impeding communities' ability to alleviate hunger and homelessness. In consultation with agencies and people experiencing hunger and homelessness, government must expand resources to shelters, affordable housing programs, food assistance programs, and other social services that directly serve the lowest income Americans.

2.14.2005

Make Poverty History
Bono, Steven Tyler rock wristbands at Grammys
MPH wristband

No one can make fighting hunger and poverty cooler than rock stars. First came the Brits with "Do They Know Its Christmas Time?" and then came the Americans with "We Are The World" — all of it 20 years ago. So, what have rock stars done for poverty lately? Wear wristbands ... at the Grammys ... in front of millions of people.


U2 and Aerosmith frontmen, Bono and Steven Tyler, respectively, brought the Make Poverty History campaign into the spotlight last night by wearing the campaign's wristband during the Grammys telecast.


Make Poverty History "brings together a wide cross section of over 200 charities, campaigns, trade unions, faith groups and celebrities who are united by a common belief that 2005 offers a unprecedented opportunity for global change." The campaign seeks eliminate unfair trade practices, cancel unpayable poor country debts, and focusing international aid more on poor people's needs, like basic health care and education.


But is this another case of celebrities endorsing a cause they know little or nothing about? No. Bono and Tyler aren't new to the fight against hunger and poverty. Bono has been a long time advocate for debt reduction, founding his own non-profit organization, DATA. According to its website, DATA's goal is "to raise awareness about, and spark response to the crises swamping Africa: unpayable Debts, uncontrolled spread of AIDS, and unfair Trade rules which keep Africans poor." Meanwhile, Tyler's band joined WHY's own Artists Against Hunger & Poverty program in 2004. During their tour, Aerosmith raised funds and awareness for some of the most innovative and effective community-based organizations in WHY's Reinvesting In America database.


To get involved in the Make Poverty History campaign, go here.
Maurer: Red Tape Feeds Poverty
Swiss Ambassador criticises rest of the world
Peter Maurer

Brushing aside the notion of Swiss neutrality, Peter Maurer, Switzerland's ambassador to the United Nations, recently said that global efforts to fight hunger are failing. The two biggest culprits in the failure to fight poverty, according to Maurer: red tape and unrealistic efforts.


Maurer gave the UN General Assembly a piece of his mind on Friday, during the discussion of a report on achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), reported NZZ Online. The MDGs call for "... reducing the proportion of people living on less than $1 a day to half the 1990 level by 2015 — from 27.9 percent of all people in low and middle income economies to 14.0 percent. The Goals also call for halving the proportion of people who suffer from hunger between 1990 and 2015."


"Serious efforts are still necessary... too many poverty-reduction strategies are still characterised by a technocratic approach and are divorced from reality," said Maurer.


At least, Switzerland talks the talk and walks the walk. "We are fully aware that some of these recommendations may appear problematic to some. We will therefore need to work very hard in the coming months to establish a solid consensus on these recommendations and their implementation. Switzerland is willing to play its part in this process," said Maurer.


Get Maurer's full comments here.